<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publish blog posts to Twitter automatically (using FriendFeed)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://headphono.us/2008/10/30/publish-blog-posts-to-twitter-using-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://headphono.us/2008/10/30/publish-blog-posts-to-twitter-using-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>Pras Sarkar blogs about web technology, music, social networks, digital identities and other random things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vidEstream™ &#187; social network integration: an amazing time saver.</title>
		<link>http://headphono.us/2008/10/30/publish-blog-posts-to-twitter-using-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>vidEstream™ &#187; social network integration: an amazing time saver.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headphono.us/?p=61#comment-9250</guid>
		<description>[...] is simple with servises like friendfeed and twitterfeed. i chose to use friendfeed because i read that friendfeed posts faster than twitterfeed, but both solutions are very simple. inside [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is simple with servises like friendfeed and twitterfeed. i chose to use friendfeed because i read that friendfeed posts faster than twitterfeed, but both solutions are very simple. inside [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pras Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://headphono.us/2008/10/30/publish-blog-posts-to-twitter-using-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-7636</link>
		<dc:creator>Pras Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headphono.us/?p=61#comment-7636</guid>
		<description>@Phil: Yes, that&#039;s true. Hopefully that&#039;s an intermediate step that FriendFeed will get rid of (I&#039;m not holding my breath).

Ultimately though, it maximizes the readership (and feedback) of your posts since you have FriendFeed readers in addition to the ones on Twitter and your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil: Yes, that&#8217;s true. Hopefully that&#8217;s an intermediate step that FriendFeed will get rid of (I&#8217;m not holding my breath).</p>
<p>Ultimately though, it maximizes the readership (and feedback) of your posts since you have FriendFeed readers in addition to the ones on Twitter and your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://headphono.us/2008/10/30/publish-blog-posts-to-twitter-using-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-7635</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headphono.us/?p=61#comment-7635</guid>
		<description>The only caveat being that any links generated by FriendFeed (ff.im links) point back to the relevant FriendFeed entry instead of the blog entry.  Great if you don&#039;t mind people seeing the conversation on the intermediate link, but slower than using, say, wordpress plugin that pings twitter directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only caveat being that any links generated by FriendFeed (ff.im links) point back to the relevant FriendFeed entry instead of the blog entry.  Great if you don&#8217;t mind people seeing the conversation on the intermediate link, but slower than using, say, wordpress plugin that pings twitter directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.012 seconds -->
